250 fagfellevurderte klimaforskningsrapporter basert på observasjoner i naturen er til nå identifisert for fjoråret, den komplette listen er her. Det er en rapport på hver eneste hverdag og litt til. Dette er i tillegg til en tilsvarende mengde i årene forut for dette. Forrige samling med faktabasert klimaforskning fra NIPCC er her, og det fins mer: hele 1350 rapporter. De har alle til felles at de er skeptiske eller avvisende til FNs klimapanel som med sine politiske prosesser har vedtatt at det er våre utslipp av CO2 som styrer klimaet. Siden CO2en ikke er skyldig, hva kan det da være som har en dominerende effekt på klimaet vårt, ifølge sunn naturvitenskap fra ledende forskere? Vel, ta en kikk på illustrasjonen, eller les litt da vel….
Et lite utvalg kan du se her
“Mounting evidence from proxy records suggests that variations in solar activity have played a significant role in triggering past climate changes.” http://geology.gsapubs.org/content/43/3/203
“Solar minimum conditions reinforce the high pressure above Greenland together with a weakening of the other two North Atlantic pressure centres.” http://www.ann-geophys.net/33/207/2015/angeo-33-207-2015.pdf
“There have been many studies noting correlations between solar cycles and changes in the Earth temperature.”
http://www.rxiv.org/pdf/1504.0124v1.pdf
“Ocean heat content anomaly (OHCa) time series in some areas of the Pacific are significantly correlated with the total solar irradiance (TSI). ” http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364682615300778
“Here, we demonstrate that the CR [cosmic ray] effect on ΔGT [global temperature] is robust to reasonable measures of global temperature,…” http://www.pnas.org/content/112/34/E4640.extract
“Solar forcing as an important trigger for West Greenland sea-ice variability over the last millennium.”
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379115301682
“We show how clouds provide the necessary degrees of freedom to modulate the Earth’s albedo setting the hemispheric symmetry. We also show that current climate models lack this same degree of hemispheric symmetry and regulation by clouds.”
http://webster.eas.gatech.edu/Papers/albedo2015.pdf
“While there is scientific consensus that global and local mean sea level (GMSL and LMSL) has risen since the late nineteenth century, the relative contribution of natural and anthropogenic forcing remains unclear.”
http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2015/150729/ncomms8849/full/ncomms8849.html
“Most present-generation climate models simulate an increase in global-mean surface temperature (GMST) since 1998, whereas observations suggest a warming hiatus.”
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v517/n7536/full/nature14117.html
“Positive (negative) phases of the AMO coincide with warmer (colder) North Atlantic sea surface temperatures. The AMO is linked with decadal climate fluctuations, such as Indian and Sahel rainfall, European summer precipitation, Atlantic hurricanes and variations in global temperatures. It is widely believed that ocean circulation drives the phase changes of the AMO by controlling ocean heat content. “
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v521/n7553/full/nature14491.html
“Predicted slow-down in the rate of Atlantic sea ice loss. Recent forecasts indicate that a spin-down of the thermohaline circulation that began near the turn of the century will continue, and this will result in near neutral decadal trends in Atlantic winter sea ice extent in coming years, with decadal growth in select regions.”
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015GL065364/abstract
Listen er samlet av Kenneth Richard og ble først publisert på notrickszone.com.
Ikke bare skeptiske konklusjoner, for i denne rapporten om globalt havnivåheving (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2015/150729/ncomms8849/full/ncomms8849.html) sier de dette:
«We provide even with an improved estimate of natural GMSL variability unambiguous evidence for a significant anthropogenic footprint in GMSL rise since 1900».
Det er litt leit at de fleste interessante papirer må man betale for å få se.